12. 06. 2008
“Out Of Line” + Daniel Chong’s “Sungai Wang Forces” by Zedeck Siew
That said, I’m going to waffle anyway:
Oddly enough for Daniel Chong, a consummate doodler (I believe I have an original Daniel hiding between the pages of a comic trade paperback, somewhere on my shelf), none of his stuff in “Out Of Line” are actually drawings. (They are not on sale, either.) Most are in several binders, print-outs concerning the artist’s obsession with the employment of Cartesian-coordinate-system quadrant matrices to visually describe (and make sense of) the world: Ken Wilber’s expressions of the integral movement, game theory charts, mystical mandalas, the chambers of the heart. (He also exhibits a canvas frame’s cross-beams and one of Central Market’s actual windows as examples.)
Alongside such an exhaustive survey, Daniel’s other piece is relatively simple, but it is a fitting counterpart to his riffs on expressive patterns. “Sungai Wang Forces” consists of a traffic cone, upended and suspended from a ceiling girder, serving as a funnel for rice. Viewers are invited to fill it up and push it into motion. The cone swings, Foucault-pendulum-like, spilling grains of rice in shifting ovals.
It’s an elegant response to the push-pull of consumption that governs our lives, these days. The rising price of rice (by extrapolation, the global food crisis and general resource scarcity) is coupled with a symbol of perpetual roadwork (extravagant mega-projects or ill-conceived schemes that return little actual value); gravity seems to stand in for the irresistibility of market forces. The crucial point is the interactions of these elements and their evident imperfections: the pendulum’s patterns are less-than-mathematically precise because the traffic cone is an imperfect weight, and the rice an imperfect medium.
The result? A haphazard, more-often-than-not unbalanced whorl of wasted food. Its lesson? The free market tenet of self-regulation, free of human agency, is completely effective only in flawless conditions. To allow it its foibles is to allow people to go hungry.
~
The above article first appeared on the Kakiseni blog last week. To post a comment, please go here.
User Comments
| posted by Daniel C, Fri 20.06.200809:28:36 AM |
| here's Sungai Wang Forces in music and motion :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fitpoSjY4ps
|
| posted by Batu Api, Thu 19.06.200817:29:13 PM Readers say: |
| LOLS! Congrats Annexe, you win joint prize with G. Petronas for having the most interactive audience! I know because I have seen paintings being poked and had an installation kicked over. Twice. Inside every Malaysian is an art lover whose voice intones: muuuustttt toooouuuchhhh.... artttt. As much as it brings my heart into my mouth when it happens (especially when the work is mine, even more so when it's a Joseph Tan painting), I find Malaysians' hands on approach to art disturbingly charming, almost loveable. I don't defend painting pokers, but I do understand why they do it. Take an audience who knows nothing about the value of art, bombard them with uncontextualized exhibitions featuring commodifyable art objects alongside interactive installations... hell, even I don't know what I can and can't touch sometimes. If you give people a graffiti wall, don't be surprised if they like it so much they decide the entire gallery is fair game. It's like kids coloring outside the lines. Isn't that what you wanted?
|
| posted by Zedeck Siew, Wed 18.06.200811:04:28 AM |
| Hey Daniel: Aik! Sorry -- I completely forgot about the circle and pet works ... missed the labels on them, too.
|
| posted by Daniel Chong, Wed 18.06.200802:26:10 AM |
| Thanks Zedeck :) Sweet! Need to correct 2 things though :( The works are for sale :P Duit for Daniel! And I did draw. In Central Market Perspectives, I painted the square frame of a gallery window blue. Next to it was a circle of the same size and within it I made drawings of my impression of the show and the surrounding environment. On the wall opposite, I invited gallery visitors to draw their pets. I've finished clearing up the show. I gave the leftover rice to the people from Food Not Bombs. They distribute food to the urban poor.
|
| posted by lainie - having severely attention span problems, will read blog comments etc later when neighbour's kid stops karaokeing., Sat 14.06.200814:54:19 PM |
| there are ways to react and challenge installations, but i dont reckon scrawling a crude 3 word summary on the installation added the kind of value you implied (perhaps about space and respect). unless the vandal comes forward to illuminate us by providing a better reason for those actions, which i doubt is possible, this isn't exactly as excusable as pissing on a manifesto.
|
| posted by pang, Sat 14.06.200810:04:26 AM |
| Did you all not consider that all those issues you raised -- Burma, wastage, frivolity -- are exactly as intended by the artist, and he evoked them without the necessity of writing any words apart from his title "Sungai Wang Forces"? What is so clever about vandalising someone's art anyway? Talk about giving away the obvious. Why didn't people sribble "flowers for loners" on Van Gogh's Sunflowers?
|
| posted by karl, Sat 14.06.200802:42:26 AM |
| like i pointed out in the blog,the writing could actually be a protest towards the work or even complement the work as something that provokes questions in the viewers minds..i think it added value personally
|
| posted by karl, Sat 14.06.200802:40:30 AM |
| i must point out dear friends that there was alot of rice there and people have been stepping on it to turn the cone as it is part of the work,so that takes away the donation option...the little activist in me just feels the rice would be put to better use :)
|
| posted by lainie, Sat 14.06.200802:34:27 AM |
| hmmm. *frown*. beras. well, put that way, any amount of money and energy spent on that exhibition could have been translated into beras for burma instead, no? just easier to see with the use of rice.
|
| posted by Reduce, reuse, repair & recycle, Fri 13.06.200817:20:39 PM |
| That's not to say the rice won't be eaten after the exhibition. The question should be, what happens to the rice when the exhibition comes down?
|
| posted by Karl, Fri 13.06.200812:19:19 PM |
| To any visitors of the gallery,watch out for the wall behind the 'rice' piece of 'art'..some dudes illegally graffiti'ed the wall, "BERAS UNTUK BURMA"..that amount of rice can actually feed a family or more
|
Related Links
print | e-mail to a friend | post comment




